Scroll down an inch or two to get to the meat and potatoes of the articles.
Vegetarians can scroll down an inch or two to get to the tofu and brown rice.
Just for fun: watch the 2 lines of header above and press your F5 key
Is this the hill for which you want to die?
Soldiers have the good sense to wonder (privately). Even the generals sometimes contemplate that question. It's too bad that the politicians don't stop to think.
Professor Patricia Sullivan (U of Ga) studied the topic. She Investigated 122 military 'interventions' involving the world's big guys: USA, UK, France, USSR/Russia, China - between 1945 and 2003. Using factors such as
- troop levels
- alliances
- troop levels
- length of conflict
she developed a method for determining the probability that the intervening country will achieve its goals. Hint: Vegas gives much better odds.
- Intervention as a means of getting compliance by another nation? 1:6 (that one is a sucker bet).
- Propping up a foreign regime? 2:5 (stick to roulette or keno)
- US vs North Vietnam & friends? Less than 1 in 4 (put your money into Ponzi schemes - late in the Ponzi racket - or penny stocks)
- Overthrow Saddam? 2:3 (duh!)
- Routing insurgents to bring democracy? 1:4 (and the damned fool said to go on)
The Big Kuhuna of using force to achieve political goals: as troop levels go up, the probability of succeeding goes down.
Labels: insurgents, intervention, odds, saddam, vietnam, war
posted by Recovering Republican® © ™ #
1:16 AM